



I have watched two movies recently that have not aged well at all.
Think of 80's fashions, for example. They have not aged particularly well, although parachute pants are fun for costume parties. Movies can be the same way. You may be able to appreciate the cinematic equivalent of neon miniskirts, but you wouldn't want to actually wear one (or watch them regularly).
When I was in high school, I really
liked Time After Time (1979), starting Mary Steenburgen and Malcolm McDowell. I thought it was very romantic and very clever - please remember I was 15 or so. The movie starts with HG Wells showing his newly completed time machine to his gentlemen friends - intellectuals, etc. Unbeknown to him, one of his friends, Dr. Stevenson, is actually Jack the Ripper. When the police get wise to Jack, he jumps in the time machine and takes off for 1979. HG has to follow to save the future from the Ripper. He meets Amy (Mary S), who soon becomes a pawn in the tussle between HG and the Ripper.
It actually sounds pretty good when I write the plot out. However, the blood is totally fake, the dialog is lame, the sets look like Mary Poppins, and HG really seems to be gay. (There is that problem with British men and the illusion of gay-ness. I must have not noticed at 15.) Plus he runs in the film (to find a pay phone!) and he runs like a girl. This is common in film - Peter O'Toole, whom I consider very sexy, also ran like a girl. So I cannot recommend this! Now, Animal House and Jaws (totally fake shark) and No Way to Treat a Lady (outdated social and sexual roles) are still perfect in every way, so why didn't this movie work out? Crappy sets and dialog would be my quick answer.
Next I watched
The Hunger, with Catherine Deneuve, David Bowie and Susan Sarandon. This is a movie for gorgeous actors only. And gorgeous scenery. Most of the movie is shot in the gorgeous three (at least) story home of Miriam (Catherine D), an extremely old vampire. There are constant shots of sheer white floor length curtains blowing in the wind, the vampires in bed asleep or trying to sleep, and unrecognizable images. For the first ten minutes, I swear I kept asking myself - what does the monkey have to do with anything? Eventually you find out, but it's that kind of show. Anyway, eventually you don't care.
Miriam has been making herself companions over the years, promising them immortality, but they all eventually die. It may take a couple of hundred hears, but they do get old and die. Watching David Bowie go through that process is the best part of the film.
Miram next sets her sights on Dr. Sarah Roberts (Susan S). The movie is mostly known, I believe, for the lesbian sex scene between Catherine and Susan. They are both very beautiful, but you have probably seen more lesbian sex on after-school specials by this point. It's a very chaste sex scene.
I regularly watch Nosferatu, which was filmed in 1922, and it still scares me. Why is The Hunger so silly? All syle and no substance. Tony Scott directed. He did Man on Fire, etc. Explains a lot.